Archive for March, 2009

Another Miscarriage of Justice

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

DNA clears ‘killer’ Sean Hodgson after 30 years in jail

Teresa De Simone

to not show photographer information –> to not show image description –>

Teresa De Simone, who was found strangled in a car in Southampton in December 1979

here with the id “dynamic-image-navigation” is used so that the innerHTML can be written to by the JS call below. –>

Sean O’Neill, Crime Editor

div#related-article-links p a, div#related-article-links p a:visited { color:#06c; }

A convicted murderer who has spent nearly 30 years in prison for the death of a young woman in 1979 could not have been the killer, according to new DNA tests.

The case of Sean Hodgson, 58, has been referred to the Court of Appeal as a matter of urgency by the Criminal Cases Review Commission and he is expected to be freed next week. The commission said that the findings raised serious concerns about the safety of many other murder convictions and called for a wideranging review of scores of cases.

A spokesman said: “We have decided to contact the Director of Public Prosecutions to discuss the desirability of a project to identify and review similar murder cases arising from the time before DNA testing and where testable forensic evidence still survives, which could confirm or cast doubt on the safety of a conviction, and where the defendant is still alive. A guilty plea or the existence of admissions should not exclude cases.”

Julian Young, Hodgson’s solicitor, said: “Will this open the floodgates? I would say anyone who believes that they’ve been wrongly convicted, and thinks DNA tests would help, should contact a lawyer immediately.”


Times Archive

Related Links

Hodgson, who is mentally ill and held in the hospital wing of Albany jail, was convicted in 1982 of the murder of Teresa de Simone, 22, whose body was found in her car in Southampton in December 1979.

If the conviction is overturned, Hodgson would be one of the longest-serving victims of a miscarriage of justice. The only comparable case is that of Stephen Downing, who was jailed for 27 years for beating typist Wendy Sewell to death in Bakewell, Derbyshire, but released in 2002. Hodgson has continued to protest his innocence but it was only after his solicitors asked last year for a review and DNA testing, a technique that was not available at the time of his trial, that his case was referred.

Hampshire police have now reopened their files and the force is conducting a new murder investigation to find the real killer. A source said: “It is a live and active inquiry.”

Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, will hear the case next Wednesday and it is understood that arrangements are being made for Hodgson to be released into appropriate care. Prosecutors are not expected to oppose the challenge and the commission said there was “a real possibility that the court will consider the conviction unsafe and quash it”.

Miss de Simone, a gas board clerk and part-time barmaid, had been sexually assaulted before being choked to death with the chain of a gold crucifix that she wore around her neck.

Hodgson, of no fixed abode, confessed to a Roman Catholic prison chaplain, Father Frank Moran, that he had killed Miss de Simone when she found him sleeping in her car and began screaming. He said he put his hand over her mouth to try to keep her quiet and ended up killing her.

The confession was made on the first anniversary of Miss de Simone’s death, and Hodgson told the priest that the image of her face was haunting him. The prosecution case was aided by scientific evidence that showed that Hodgson was of the same blood type as the attacker.

But at his trial, at Winchester Crown Court in 1982, Hodgson withdrew his confession and pleaded not guilty. It emerged that he had confessed to hundreds of other crimes, including burglaries that had never been committed, and that the killer’s blood type was common.

Hodgson, who is also known by the first name Robert, did not give evidence. According toThe Timesof February 2 1982, he told the court: “I would like to tell members of the jury I cannot go into the witness box itself because I am a pathological liar.”

But at the end of a 15-day trial, the jury returned a unanimous guilty verdict having deliberated for only 3½ hours. Mr Justice Sheldon, the trial judge, told Hodgson: “It is a verdict with which I entirely agree. I have no doubt whatsoever that you were guilty of this appalling, horrible crime of killing that girl.”

Hodgson was refused leave to appeal against his conviction the next year and has continued to protest his innocence. Last year his case was taken over by a new legal team.

His solicitor asked Hampshire Police to review the evidence and specifically to carry out DNA testing. The Forensic Science Service had stored material from the case in its archives and DNA tests were carried out on body fluids from the crime scene.

When compared with Hodgson’s DNA profile, they showed that he was not Miss de Simone’s attacker.

The case was passed to the CCRC, which referred it to the Court of Appeal as a matter of urgency.

Mr Young said last night of Hodgson: “He is obviously pleased the matter is going forward. He is excited because he is going to be seeing the outside world for the first time in a number of years. We hope he will be released on Wednesday and he will have to make a new life for himself.”

Mary Sedotti, Miss de Simone’s mother, said she was upset and distressed that her daughter’s killer had not been caught and that she was having to relive the events of three decades ago. She added: “He should not have confessed at the time.”

Research Papers or not research papers?

Saturday, March 14th, 2009

Hello again,

From the appeal the other week, we are waiting to see if Mr Risdon will release the Great Ormond Street Hospital papers will be released that may help our case, apparently they have been worked on for a good number of years but nobody has mentioned them in all the cases that have been held in that time from what I know (and lets face it…that ain’t much usually).

Apparently they don’t seem keen to release them lets see what happens…

Another article from Canada

Ontario Attorney General Chris Bentley said a team of medical and legal experts including Ontario Court Justice Donald Ebbs and the province’s chief forensic pathologist will head the inquiry into the 142 ’shaken baby’ cases investigated during 1986 to 2006.

Photograph by: Stringer/Reuters, Reuters

Linda Nguyen

The Ontario government announced Tuesday it will launch a formal review into shaken baby syndrome cases to determine if any judicial errors resulted from the investigations.

Ontario Attorney General Chris Bentley said a team of medical and legal experts including Ontario Court Justice Donald Ebbs and the province’s chief forensic pathologist will head the inquiry into the 142 “shaken baby” cases investigated during 1986 to 2006.

A second team led by Ontario’s former associate of chief justice, Coulter Osborne, will also look into whether compensation should be paid to those who were wrongfully convicted in the cases.

The reviews follow 169 recommendations made by Justice Stephen Goudge in his final report on the injustices committed by disgraced pathologist Dr. Charles Smith during his tenure as the province’s chief pathologist from 1991 to 2001.

“Justice Goudge has given us an excellent roadmap for progress, and we are following it so that Ontarians who may have been affected by these terrible human tragedies can find the justice they deserve,” he said in a statement. “We will take every opportunity to ensure that justice is done.”

These current cases under review were not investigated by Smith but involved other pathologists, Bentley said.

No timeline was given on when the reviews will be completed.

Smith was found to have committed serious errors in 20 of 45 criminally suspicious deaths he investigated during this period.

Though Smith lacked basic knowledge about forensic pathology, he was considered one of Canada’s leading experts in the field and his findings helped lead to homicide charges against parents and caregivers - many of which were unwarranted.

Goudge’s recommendations were aimed at improving the forensic pathology in the province and included: establishing a governing council to oversee the duties and responsibilities of the coroner’s office and the creation of an accredited one-year university training program.

He also called on the province to address the acute shortage of forensic pathologists by recruiting and paying higher salaries.

 ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

A Note from Keran she is now upto Januarys post and thanks everyone for their continued support. I have to send her some more stamps in now so she can send them out, so hopefully you will hear soon.

Take care

Iain

To ‘L’ RIP

Saturday, March 14th, 2009

One of my ex Police colleagues was laid to rest last week after she lost her battle with Leukemia. She leaves a partner and two children. ‘L’ was a very optimistic, generous and kind person. She was amongst the last officers I trained before leaving and was one of those who made the effort put into their training all the more worth while.

She was a great Officer and will be missed by all those she knows, they asked for yellow flowers at the funeral. Which for me is such an appropriate thing as the Daffodils are now starting to spring forth to herald spring time and remind me of how the seasons used to control your life on our beat in the likes of Hyde Park. ‘L’ will be blooming wherever she is, some people sparkle and shine in the gloomiest and darkest of times. ‘L’ was one of them.

Your sadly missed.

Sadly ‘L’ wasn’t the only sad losses of late apart from the troops we lose all too regulalry in Afghanistan. The troubles (that had never truly gone away - just not reported) in Northern Ireland have seen the re-emergence of terror groups and the killing of two troops and the wounding of others as well as the cold blooded murder of an Officer, just trying to keep the peace.

I met RUC Officers on various courses and the stories they told of how they and their families had to lead their life’s never ceased to amaze me. They and the people of Northern Ireland deserve the peace that has started to come into their life’s. Officers over here think things maybe bad, but we, rather …you, are lucky. They couldn’t even hang out their uniform shirts for fear of an attack.

Finally on a more positive note, the introduction of ladies to the Royal Hospital Chelsea, well what a bunch of characters they are (the men and the ladies), the lady who said she was pleased to be looked after in her older years, but also with a twinkle in her eye said  ’…and there are 300 men here’! Its nice to see life goes on.

I hope I am blessed to be that sparky later on in life!

I hope you are to.

‘L’ - never forgotten

Experts changing sides and appeal update

Thursday, March 12th, 2009

The article a few paragraphs below is by Dee Hall, shows how in recent years in the States certain experts are now changing their views on SBS. There was an expert in the Louise Woodward case who also did a 180 degree turn. But we will come to that in a mo. There are developments in Canada again to clear up the mess created by Dr Smith.

As you know our case moves on, slowly but surely. The judges listened to our team and the CPS, then the defence and CPS again of another SBS case followed, where the Father has been accused of SBS. Albeit with only two elements of the Triad, NO Retinal bleeding (interesting to note that no resus was attempted and there was no retinal bleeds).

 Our new evidence and other issues were addressed and the judges considered both cases before coming back with their directions for the next level, in our case a 3 day hearing and in the other case, a 2 day hearing. There is a list of tasks each of the teams (involved in both cases) now have to sort out whilst we wait for a date to be sorted. This could take some time as a Court needs to be secured, as well as the services of the Judges and the Experts. 

We don’t mind as long as it takes we will fight on, and we have plenty of fight left in us.  

DEE J. HALL
When Audrey Edmunds went to prison 10 years ago, doctors who testified against her said they were certain that 7-month-old Natalie Beard was killed and that Edmunds was to blame.

On Thursday, the same Dane County Circuit Court judge who sentenced the Waunakee day-care provider to 18 years in prison heard testimony from three physicians rebutting the conclusion — used to convict Edmunds — that Natalie died of “shaken baby syndrome.”

Natalie died not long after being dropped off at Edmunds’ house in apparent good health on Oct. 16, 1995.

The experts said the symptoms they once thought were proof of shaken-baby syndrome — hemorrhages and specific injuries to the brain and bleeding in the eyes — have in the past decade been linked to dozens of other causes, including accidents, illness, infection, old injuries and congenital defects.

“There are no studies that substantiate that shaking and shaking only produces this triad of injuries,” said Dr. Patrick Barnes, a pediatric neuroradiologist at Stanford University. He added later in the hearing, “I’m embarrassed to say I testified to that in the past.”

Something as mundane as an ear infection — which Natalie had shortly before her death — could spread to the brain with life-threatening consequences, he said.

“A simple ear infection a week before this scan could be the cause of what you see here?” Wisconsin Innocence Project attorney Keith Findley asked, pointing to CT scans of Natalie’s head.

“That’s right,” Barnes replied.

Innocence Project

Edmunds is represented by the University of Wisconsin Law School’s Innocence Project, which is seeking to convince Judge Daniel Moeser to grant her a new trial. The prosecution is led by Dane County Assistant District Attorneys Mary Ellen Karst and Shelly Rusch.

Moeser heard the first of two days of testimony from defense experts this week, which will be followed by a two-day evidentiary hearing put on by the prosecution in late February.

Edmunds, a 45-year-old mother of three, has consistently maintained her innocence. As many as two dozen of her supporters packed the sixth-floor courtroom during the seven hours of testimony. Edmunds, whose hair was once stylish and blond, is now a simple brown shoulder-length cut tinged with gray.

Barnes said that for the first 15 years of his career he mostly testified against parents and day-care providers in shaken-baby cases, even writing a chapter in an influential textbook that detailed the classic signs of shaken babies.

But for the past 15 years, Barnes said, he mostly has testified for defendants because he’s convinced the evidence now shows shaken-baby syndrome — in the absence of an impact to the baby, such as hitting a wall — is more myth than science. Better imaging has allowed physicians and scientists to see more of what goes on in the brain, he said.

“What we found when (magnetic resonance imaging) came along was that what we had previously been diagnosing (as shaken-baby syndrome) were wrong. We were wrong on the pattern of injury,” he said, “and on the timing.”

‘To the other side’

Also testifying was Dr. George Nichols, a forensic pathologist from Louisville who served for 20 years as a medical examiner for Kentucky and who now runs his own medical-legal consulting firm. Nichols said he “went to the other side” after he was asked by a prosecutor in Kentucky to sit in on a shaken-baby case. He said he initially thought a defense witness, forensic pathologist Dr. John Plunkett of Minnesota, was a “first-class nut.”

But Nichols said after reviewing the literature cited by Plunkett — some of it written by neurologists and specialists in fields outside medicine such as biomechanics — he changed his mind. Nichols said the literature showed, among other things, that if infants could be shaken hard enough to be injured or killed, they would have severe injuries to their necks — injuries Natalie didn’t have.

Ten years ago, Nichols said, he would’ve suspected Edmunds too, because Natalie was in apparent good health when dropped off and because of the nature of her injuries. But not now.

“What I was taught and what I accepted was there would be a shake and there would be an immediate loss of consciousness,” Nichols said. “That is false.”

Second Day of Hearing


More Doubt Raised In Baby’s Death

Saturday, January 27, 2007
A Dane County forensic pathologist said Friday that he no longer stands by key testimony he gave in 1996 that helped put Audrey Edmunds in prison for allegedly shaking a baby to death.

Dr. Robert Huntington III, who conducted the autopsy on 7-month-old Natalie Beard, told Dane County Circuit Judge Daniel Moeser in powerful testimony that he no longer can say with certainty how or when the baby was injured. Edmunds, who has always maintained her innocence, is serving an 18-year sentence at Burke Correctional Institution in Waupun.

In 1996, Huntington’s timing of the girl’s injuries was an important piece of the prosecution’s case against Edmunds, the Waunakee day-care provider who was caring for Natalie.

The baby, who had appeared healthy when left at Edmunds’ home on the morning of Oct. 16, 1995, began gasping and choking after drinking formula. Shortly after emergency personnel arrived, her pulse and respiration stopped.

Huntington attributed the death to “shaken impact syndrome,” also sometimes referred to as “shaken baby syndrome.”

Huntington said his testimony was based on the common medical wisdom of the day, which was that the types of injuries found in Natalie’s brain and eyes were proof she had been shaken and that the effects would have been immediate.

“Are you now comfortable with the testimony you offered in Audrey Edmunds’ trial in 1996?” Wisconsin Innocence Project attorney Keith Findley asked.

“No. No, sir, I’m not,” Huntington said.

Findley: “Are you still certain she was injured within two hours of the onset of her symptoms?”

Huntington: “No way.”

Later Findley asked, “Do you believe there was some shaking?”

Answered Huntington: “I don’t know.”

The testimony came in the second day of a hearing to determine whether Edmunds, 45, deserves a new trial. Prosecutors Mary Ellen Karst and Shelly Rusch will present their case during a two-day hearing in late February.

Moeser heard testimony from five other physicians called by Findley who challenged the notion that the type of brain and eye injuries Natalie sustained are proof of shaking or abuse. All cited an old brain injury the baby had suffered and the choking incident as being factors in the girl’s death.

Huntington said he began to doubt his testimony in the Edmunds case in 1999, when he encountered a baby at University Hospital in Madison who died after showing similar signs and symptoms to Natalie’s.

The child was fussy and clingy but otherwise responsive but collapsed suddenly and died 16 hours after she had been admitted to the hospital. He said the experience — and a review of the emerging medical literature at the time — convinced him a child could have a “lucid interval” of hours, even days, after a serious injury.

All six physicians, including Huntington, agreed that medical knowledge about brain injuries, eye injuries and choking in infants had changed significantly since Edmunds was convicted.

“Most of us in 1995 would’ve testified along essentially similar lines …. We would’ve all agreed on shaking and we would’ve all agreed in the ‘no lucid interval’ and the whole bit,” said Dr. Peter Stephens, a forensic pathologist from Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Dr. John Galaznik, a pediatrician at the University of Alabama, said he recently re-read the 1972 study that kicked off the establishment of shaken-baby syndrome as a cause of death. “By today’s standards,” Galaznik said, “it was appalling.”

Lamented Huntington: “As far as I’m concerned, this whole thing has become a whole lot less clear than it once was.”
—————————————————————————————————————————-

The last line about sums it all up. As I have said in interviews of late, Mark and Ruth may well be feeling more confused as our appeal goes on. Like most people you would trust what the Police and CPS tell you, but it really isn’t what they say, its what this hardcore of experts say. They do get paid very well, for their unproven hypothesis, so much so they can drive around in Ferrari’s in some cases.

But what they drive doesn’t really matter, what matters is that what they say isn’t proven and in a court of law, quite simply the courts ’should’ only go with beyond reasonable doubt (so there surely has to be doubt if its an unproven theory). What drives the experts?

I wish I knew why they are allowed to go on as they do, some never have acted for the defence only for the prosecution. There are so many other issues that will hopefully be reviewed at the end of this. If they (Mark & Ruth) had met the number of mainly parents and a few carers as I have I would hope they would understand, how easy it is to convict on the experts advice.

In our case the experts didn’t quite con all the jurors of course, but if you have ‘experts’ in front of you (and like in our case) had so MANY (ask why they had to use so many - maybe something to do with it makes it sound more convincing)? Look at Meadows and his 1 in 73 million, he made it up. Southall and Green’s behaviour in the Clark case. Look at Smith in Canada.

We all want answers, we all want the truth. I hope you find them.